Skip to content
QpiAI Agent Hive

Agent Hive for automotive

Turn a field signal into an engineering decision you can stand behind.

When a vehicle issue appears, the clues are rarely in one place. Agent Hive brings them together so quality and engineering teams can work out what happened, test the likely causes and decide what to do next.

For global OEMs and Tier-1 suppliers.

Illustrative field-quality investigationCase SDV-0472
  1. 01 · Field signal

    Camera unavailable after update

    Vehicle event and workshop complaint point to the same symptom.

  2. 02 · Leading pattern

    Build 24.7 × ECU rev C

    Supported by eventsRegion ruled out
  3. 03 · Fleet exposure

    Scope only the vehicles that share the pattern

    Matched by build and configuration

  4. 04 · Human decision

    Review the cohort before the next rollout wave

    Ready for engineering review

See the whole case

The clues are there. They’re just spread across too many systems.

Telemetry shows the event. Service records show what happened in the workshop. Engineering systems hold the versions, changes and test history. Agent Hive connects those pieces so the team can investigate them together.

Seven separate trails

  1. Telemetry08:43 · Camera service restarted
  2. DTCs08:44 · B14CF recorded
  3. ECU stateRevision C · calibration 7.2
  4. Software / OTA08:42 · Build 24.7 installed
  5. EngineeringCR-218 · dependency changed
  6. Service / warrantyBlank view after restart
  7. Supplier validationRevision C test record

Agent Hive joins by

  • Vehicle
  • Time
  • Version
  • Configuration

One case timeline

Reconstructed case

What happened around the fault

Each event opens its source record

  1. Build 24.7 installedOTA history
  2. Camera service restartedVehicle telemetry
  3. Fault code recordedDTC event
  4. Symptom confirmed in workshopService record
  1. 1Assemble the case
  2. 2Compare possible causes
  3. 3Engineer review
  4. 4Approve the next step

Agent Hive stays the same. The evidence, language and controls come from your automotive operation.

Operational workflows

Start with a case your team is already working.

Pick a field-quality, software, after-sales or engineering issue that currently sends people searching through different systems and asking other teams for missing context.

Field-failure investigation & exposure

Find out what failed—and which other vehicles may be at risk.

Start with the symptom, then bring in the vehicle configuration, software build, operating conditions, service history and similar cases. Engineers can see why one cause leads and how the affected group was defined.

  1. Field signal
  2. Build the case
  3. Test causes
  4. Scope exposure
  5. DecideContain, monitor or validate

Global Automotive OEM

One field-quality team follows an SDV issue from symptom to containment.

This anonymized story starts with a recurring field symptom. The team needs to connect vehicle events, ECU state, software history, configuration, workshop evidence and engineering records before it can decide how to respond.

Agent Hive does the legwork across those sources and compares several possible causes. Field quality and engineering still make the call: inspect the evidence, agree on the exposed group and approve the next step.

OEM operating view

The same investigation model extends to Tier-1 component, integration and customer-quality cases.

Read the full story
SDV field-quality deploymentHow the case moved through the teamAnonymized
Case openedIntermittent function loss after update
  1. Field quality

    Starts with the recurring symptom

    Vehicle IDs, workshop reports and the first field events enter one case.
    Case owner
  2. Agent Hive

    Reconstructs the evidence trail

    Versions, configuration, event timing and engineering changes are linked back to their sources.
    Context assembled
  3. Software + systems

    Challenges the leading explanation

    Engineers inspect supporting and contradictory evidence before agreeing on the exposed group.
    Expert review
  4. Quality approver

    Records the containment decision

    The rationale, cohort definition and required follow-up travel together.
    Decision recorded

Decision package

  • Source-linked case
  • Alternatives considered
  • Defined vehicle cohort
  • Approval record
Ready for containment review

The horizontal Agent Hive platform

Use the same Agent Hive platform across automotive work.

Field quality, software and supplier investigations use different evidence, but they do not need different AI products. Agent Hive provides the shared platform; each team brings its own systems, experts and controls.

One shared operating layer
  1. 1

    Enterprise Context

    Connect automotive terminology, vehicle identity, software versions, configurations and source permissions.

  2. 2

    Agent Orchestration

    Gather evidence, reconstruct timelines, compare causes and prepare work for expert review.

  3. 3

    Evaluation & Improvement

    Let engineers challenge evidence, correct missing context, compare alternatives and improve the workflow.

  4. 4

    Governance & Deployment

    Keep identity, approvals, audit history and deployment boundaries controlled.

Managed

Let QpiAI run the platform for you.

You keep identity rules and approved connections while QpiAI operates the Agent Hive environment.

QpiAI managed environment

  1. Customer identity
  2. Approved sources
  3. Audit history

Questions we hear from automotive teams.

Most conversations start with a difficult case, the systems holding the clues and the people who have to sign off on the next step.

Is Agent Hive automotive-specific software?

No. It is the same horizontal Agent Hive platform used across enterprise work. Automotive teams connect it to their own systems, vocabulary, review process and security controls.

Does Agent Hive replace our diagnostics, PLM, warranty or service systems?

No. Those systems remain the source of record. Agent Hive helps people investigate across them without losing the link back to the original data.

Can engineers challenge the hypotheses and exposure view?

Yes. Engineers can open the supporting and contradictory evidence, fix missing context, compare the alternatives and reject a proposed action if the case is not strong enough.

Does this work for Tier-1 suppliers as well as OEMs?

Yes. The same approach works for component failures, software integration, validation gaps, customer-quality escalations and investigations shared with an OEM.

Are you publishing results from the Global Automotive OEM story?

No. The story shows how the investigation is set up. The customer is anonymized, and the metric fields stay hidden until the customer approves them for public use.

Start with a real automotive case

Bring us the investigation your engineers still reconstruct manually.

We’ll sit down with the team, trace where the clues live and sketch the agents, review steps and deployment setup around that one case.

Book a demo