Agent Hive for semiconductor
What caused the excursion?
Bring lot history, tool data and engineering knowledge into one investigation, then let your engineers decide what happens next.

A signal tells you something changed. It rarely tells you why.
The useful clues sit across lot history, tool state, measurements, procedures and the experience of your engineering team.
Lot L24 · Wafers 07 to 12
Etch 14B · Recipe R18
High correlation
Recent chamber maintenance · Recipe parameter drift · Six related lots
Engineer gate
Validate before hold or release
Hold, inspect or release
Genealogy explains why each wafer is included
Engineers can open every source behind a finding before they act on it.
Start with the investigations that eat up engineering time.
Pick one recurring problem. Agent Hive gathers the evidence around it and works within the review process your team already uses.
Yield excursion investigation
See the strongest clues before chasing every possibility.
Compare process history, defect patterns, metrology and equipment signals. Your engineers review the likely conditions and choose the next step.
- Etch chamber BStrong match
- Recipe R18 driftReview
- Incoming materialWeak match
Engineer validates the correlation
Tool and chamber investigation
Put the anomaly in the context of what the tool was doing.
Review tool state, recipe, sensors, maintenance and recent lots together instead of opening each system separately.
WIP exposure and containment
Know which material needs attention, and why.
Follow wafer and lot genealogy through the suspect condition. Engineers can check the exposure set before deciding what to hold, inspect or release.
Genealogy explains why each wafer is included
Engineering precedent
Make the last good investigation useful again.
Find relevant RCAs, OCAPs, procedures and corrective actions. Once the team reviews the new outcome, keep it for the next engineer.
Answer includes sources, revisions and review status
PCB verification blueprint
Know what has been verified, and what needs another look.
This proposed workflow links each requirement to its constraints, ECAD outputs, simulations, tests and engineering changes.
This is an anonymized customer proposal, not a completed deployment. It describes the planned scope and architecture, with no claim of production results.
Keep sensitive fab data where it belongs.
Run Agent Hive inside the fab network, or use a controlled gateway when approved external models are allowed.
What runs together
Fab context
The lots, wafers, tools, recipes and records behind the question.
Agent teamwork
Specialist agents work the same case and show what each one found.
Testing
Real engineering questions and review criteria before a workflow is released.
Controls
Permissions, engineer sign-off and a clear record of the decision.
Deployment
Local models, or approved endpoints reached through one gateway.
Everything stays on the fab network
Run Agent Hive and the models locally.
For sites where recipes, process data and engineering records cannot leave the facility.
Fab network. No egress.
Source data stays on site
Use approved models through one controlled path.
The gateway filters and routes requests. Fab records and the audit history remain inside your environment.
Fab data stays on-premises.
Questions we hear from semiconductor teams.
The best starting point is usually one investigation that takes too much searching, coordination and expert time.
Does Agent Hive replace MES, FDC, SPC or yield systems?
No. Those systems remain the sources of record. Agent Hive brings the relevant evidence together when your team investigates a specific problem.
Can engineers see how it reached a finding?
Yes. They can open the sources, check the relationships, correct the finding and approve the next step.
Can it run inside a restricted fab network?
Yes. Agent Hive can run fully air-gapped. A hybrid setup is also available when approved model access is allowed through a controlled gateway.
Where should we start?
Choose one recurring investigation that crosses several systems and expert groups. Agree on the source data, reviewers and a clear definition of a useful answer.
Is the PCB blueprint a completed customer deployment?
No. It is an anonymized customer proposal describing planned scope and architecture. It does not include production results.
Let’s work out what a better process would look like.
We will map the evidence, the people who review it and the setup needed to support the decision.